Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fasterfox
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:40, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Fasterfox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is in direct violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST as it was meant to serve as the free web page of its subject, Fasterfox. The Mozilla Addons page lists this Wikipedia article as the support website of the author. But I said "was" because the author, Rsccman was blocked three years ago, exactly for doing this.
The subject itself fails to establish its notability; of the four sources given in the article, only two briefly mention it. Other than that, the subject has no impact. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 07:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 07:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom: this is not what Wikipedia is for. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. Refs are from company, 2 incidental mentions, and a how-to article, none of which meets the threshold of significant, and a search turned up no in depth coverage elsewhere.Dialectric (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.